tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post549689076987816164..comments2024-03-29T22:00:02.999+13:00Comments on Anglican Down Under: You are the wolves of the park, the (good) pests of the worldPeter Carrellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09535218286799156659noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-2752665463377011592014-02-18T12:15:10.346+13:002014-02-18T12:15:10.346+13:00Thank you, Peter, for not allowing my discussion o...Thank you, Peter, for not allowing my discussion of the 'non-event' you put forward as a not-able-to-be-discussed non-happening on your post here. I note also that, in your next post, which is quite voluminous in its subsequent outfall, you say you do not have the time to do what you then proceeded to do - quite fully!<br /><br />However, it's your blog, and you are free to publish stuff that begs protest - without accepting such protests as may come up.<br />Happy blogging; er..musing!Father Ron Smithhttp://kiwianglo.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-82484864617271276122014-02-18T06:02:01.640+13:002014-02-18T06:02:01.640+13:00Hi Ron
I am not publishing your comment because it...Hi Ron<br />I am not publishing your comment because it specifically contravenes the following editorial note within the post:<br /><br />"I am not going to accept comments which attempt to discuss this indicative note per se. +Richard is writing a circular letter not a blogpost!"<br /><br />I quite understand the objection you raise to one word within the indicative note, but the cited comment was made to indicate there are important meetings happening; not to engage in a discussion about how another person communicates within the life of our church.Peter Carrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09535218286799156659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-71343127719613393672014-02-17T17:40:47.486+13:002014-02-17T17:40:47.486+13:00Interesting factoid: the mother wolf will regurgit...Interesting factoid: the mother wolf will regurgitate undigested meat from her stomach for her cubs to eat. <br /><br />Yum!MichaelAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-24210172329473099262014-02-17T14:01:33.640+13:002014-02-17T14:01:33.640+13:00Very slick that wolf video may be but it is slick ...Very slick that wolf video may be but it is slick sophistry.<br /><br />Assuming the observation that streams and rivers in Yellowstone park is in fact correct and for the reasons given ie the regeneration of vegetation along their banks we could work backwards from there using another chain of reasoning to another equally plausible starting point not involving wolves.<br /><br />Such systems are highly complex and we view them with our own blinkered vision which means we see what we want to see and are blinded to that which we might not want to see or actually incapable of seeingAndreihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04536593172412406428noreply@blogger.com