tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post7247938651181512948..comments2024-03-29T13:30:56.758+13:00Comments on Anglican Down Under: More chance of Scotland beating the All Blacks than ++Rowan winning this onePeter Carrellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09535218286799156659noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-67179891487281946462010-11-14T13:36:02.629+13:002010-11-14T13:36:02.629+13:00It may have been lost, David, because I do not rec...It may have been lost, David, because I do not recall seeing it. I shall doublecheck I did not accidentally delete it. If nothing appears a few minutes after this is posted then assume it is lost.Peter Carrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09535218286799156659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-71565012151362026542010-11-14T08:50:07.254+13:002010-11-14T08:50:07.254+13:00Has my comment to Wannabe been lost in the nethers...Has my comment to Wannabe been lost in the nethersphere, or am I being censored?Brother Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333089314994730330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-5328962941984226952010-11-13T04:10:41.035+13:002010-11-13T04:10:41.035+13:00The GAFCON Primates will NOT share communion with ...The GAFCON Primates will NOT share communion with Schori. There is no question about that.WannabeAnglicanhttp://wannabeanglican.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-1575834520927539842010-11-12T15:04:04.711+13:002010-11-12T15:04:04.711+13:00Mr Conger continues to promote the falsehood, othe...Mr Conger continues to promote the falsehood, otherwise known among intelligent folk as a lie, that the Standing Committee of the Anglican Communion is a new body. It is not. It has existed for quite some time. It has a new name. Nothing more.<br /><br />It was formerly know as the Joint Standing Committee of the Primates Meeting and the Anglican Consultative Council. And the second after its name was officially changed it still consisted of the same members who were its members the second before the official name change.<br /><br />I think that suggesting small meetings lends to promoting a false premise; that there are multiple factions who presently make up the AC. That is another falsehood. There are two factions; those opposed to the two northern most North American provinces and those who are not opposed to them. Granted, the second group may be further distinguished perhaps as consisting of provinces who see themselves as the allies of TEC and ACCanada, and those provinces for whom TEC's and ACCanada's stand of solidarity with their GLBTQ brothers and sisters are not a communion breaker.<br /><br />I think that it is time to stop playing the games and lets all see whom it is exactly who make up those two groups.<br /><br />Which meeting would the ACANZP attend? My money would be on the second group.Brother Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333089314994730330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3915617830446943975.post-34396501302326212832010-11-12T11:14:16.891+13:002010-11-12T11:14:16.891+13:00Isn't the Covenant meant to be supply the answ...Isn't the Covenant meant to be supply the answer to this sort of deadlock? If not, why not? Don't Africans believe in it either?Bishop Alan Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13879516755776951638noreply@blogger.com