I quite like a good row - a brouhaha, a storm in a teacup, or just a perfect organisational storm. Especially when it is in the legal detail of things, and not taxing re theological issues, personalities and the like.
Just such a row is brewing nicely in the Communion. OK, a little more accurately, brewing in the Anglican blogosphere. But the debaters are heavy-hitters. It concerns a vacant seat on the Anglican Communion "Standing Committee". I have put the name of the committee in scare marks because even the existence and/or name of this particular committee, along with its role and imputed power is part of the storm.
A sequence of posts goes like this:
Return: see Preludium above, because that post includes a revision.
Confused? If not, please write now to ++Rowan (aka "the umpire") with the resolution!