Last week I mentioned that my Dad had died. Yesterday his funeral was held in the Transitional Cathedral here in Christchurch. All was lovely and wonderful about that and for that we his family are very appreciative of the many people who made it all possible - thank you!
Of course we had a hand in a number of things ourselves, including four tributes by one of his two surviving brothers, myself, a grandson and one of my brothers. Me focusing on Dad's contribution to church life and my brother focusing on what it meant to be a child of our father.
I thought I would share a few thoughts about Dad and his life, not all of them covered by those tributes.
Dad [Brian Carrell] was born in 1933 in Lincoln Road, Christchurch. The same year, incidentally, that the Carmelite nunnery was built further down Lincoln Road (you can see "1933" on its fence!)
In his household, along with his parents, were his widowed grandfather (who owned the house) and his great grandfather - William Rowe. William was born in 1839 (England) and died in 1936. He was a soldier in the Crimean War. He would have held Dad on his knee, and in the past couple of years Dad has held three of his great grandchildren on his knee ... the years back to 1840 (a significant date in NZ history) do not seem so far back when you put it like that in terms of generational cross over!
At the present time in NZ we bewail aspects of a changing society, and this includes loss of a sense of community, and anger at lack of access to decent housing. Some laments about this state of affairs include nostalgia for a past in NZ when things were better.
But were they?
I recall Dad telling me about two pastoral experiences when he was Vicar of St. Matthew's, Dunedin (1965-71).
One was the saddest funeral he ever took: the deceased, the undertaker, and himself. The deceased had been a "patient" of Cherry Farm (a psychiatric hospital near Dunedin), who had experienced some kind of (in the language of former times) nervous breakdown and his family had had him committed to hospital. He never left and, clearly, the family had not kept in touch. Not quite community values (or family values) to be nostalgic for!
And, treatment of mentally ill people back in the days when he would have gone to hospital (1920s/30s), involved hospitalization as first resort rather than last, as it is these days. Perhaps these days are better than the "old days."
Another story was visiting someone in a house which was part of a very poor area in Dunedin, not far from where we lived (in the vicarage amidst middle class splendour). Recall that Dunedin is a city resplendent with wonderful, solid, prestigious buildings and splendid brick and mortar houses, due to the glory days of the gold rushes in central Otago. Not all shared in the wealth which gold generated!
On this visit, Dad went through the front door and his foot broke through the rotten floorboards of the hallway. Thankfully, in my recollection, later, this set of derelict houses was demolished and new and better housing built. But, as we (rightly) wish for better access to quality housing in NZ today, let's work on what we can do now and not waste time on nostalgia for what may never have been the case, that once upon a time, everyone had a chance to live in a decent house.
Final memory, also of Dunedin days. I mentioned in my tribute that Dad was chair of the organising committee for the 1969 Billy Graham Crusade, held at Carisbrook, Dunedin. What I didn't mention is that I can recall every word that Billy Graham spoke to me and my brothers when Dad introduced us to him.
"God bless you."
There you have it - this week's post!
5 comments:
It's so interesting to read these stories, thank you for sharing them, Peter. I would've been 4yo when Billy Graham did that crusade. I sure do remember hearing his name a lot when I was young!
Did you live in High Street, Peter? I knew Wallace Marriott a bit - he must have been your dad's successor. There were grand houses in High Street but Carroll Street (not Carrell!) was a bit rundown. I think there was an old Chinese church there - a relic perhaps of the gold rush days. I believe there was a Presbyterian missionary who worked among the Chinese miners in Arrowtown and thereabouts in the 1860s or so, and some of them must have settled in Dunedin. The city had of course the Sew Hoy factory.
Pax et bonum
William Greenhalgh
Yes, William, 270 High Street [it hasn’t been the vicarage for several decades]; Wal Marriott succeeded Dad; and Carroll Street was somewhat rundown!
Seeing the heading "Living through history" under the words "Anglican Down Under", it seems impossible not to think of the current news with regard to the Christchurch Cathedral - an exciting new plan for its reopening.
One of my colleagues, a psychotherapist who used to be an accountant, discovered the initial cost of building the Cathedral (over 40 years), adjusted for inflation etc., and worked out to build it from scratch today would cost around $700 million dollars, just shy of the amount being spent on the new Chch stadium. Reputedly, Heaton Rhodes fronted a lot of that money.
I guess today we put our money towards rugby stadiums not buildings for worship.
But, of course, the Cathedral isn't just a worship building. If it was it would have been rebuilt twenty times over by now.
The interview on this clip with Nicky Wagner is actually a superb potted history of the Cathedral, Christchurch, and the rebuild saga. She talks about how it was always more than just a place of worship, the reasonableness of Bishop Victoria's proposal to rebuild a new one, and the current pragmatic compromise between 'lawsuits forever' preventing its demolition versus the Church's desire to be back in the heart of the square, and the city's desire to have the matter settled and move on.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christ-church-cathedral-faces-40m-shortfall-despite-new-staged-approach-the-front-page/ZWMIOVXNDNDFDDUEOPFUCEER3Y/
The intellectual debate falls to the side as the pragmatic and conservative one wins out. Perhaps this is the way of NZ, or the way of capitalist democracies, or the way of the world. But the questions still remain:
In a time of tremendous wealth equality and multiple social crises, should a church spend millions on Victorian heritage and civic religion? Is this the way of the carpenter's son, the Gospel? And is a Victorian Anglican Cathedral still a fitting symbol for character and spirit of the new Christchurch, let alone Anglicanism Down Under today?
* Should read "wealth inequality" not "equality"!
Post a Comment